Closing TCP/SSL connexion or let the VM close it

[Frank Muller]

Thanks Guilherme.
Anyone else?

N.B: I’m having troubles to reach this mailinglist. It’s said mailmain
can’t find module gd

/Frank

Thur . 17 Dec. 2020 19:38, Guilherme Andrade <g@REDACTED> wrote  :

> Hello Frank,
>
> AFAIK, the only difference is that, when letting the VM take care of it,
> monitors will be triggered and delivered to the connection owners (whether
> SSL processes or TCP ports.)
>
> What kind of impact that will have on performance is unknown to me - I
> suppose only measurements could tell.
>
> (Unless you're explicitly `gen_tcp:shutdown`ing or `ssl:shutdown`ing your
> connections in order to try and flush the send buffers - in that case, I
> expect there will be a difference.)
>
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 07:14, Frank Muller <frank.muller.erl@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I’m wondering if my processes should explicitly close the TCP/SSL
>> connexion they hold before exiting or should they let the VM handles that?
>> Does it make any difference?
>>
>> I’ve a bunch a processes in my app (around ~15K per at any even time).
>>
>> /Frank
>>
>
>
> --
> Guilherme
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20201218/41697962/attachment.htm>