[erlang-questions] Orelse and andalso as short-hand for case

Per Hedeland per@REDACTED
Sat Jul 28 13:03:57 CEST 2018


On 2018-07-28 04:54, Dmitry Belyaev wrote:
> I believe Richard's email was provided in one of the responses:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Richard O'Keefe <raoknz@REDACTED> wrote:
> ...
> 
> To me it looks like either mailing list configuration or usage of reply instead of reply all - I often do forget about that in Gmail web UI and even in my mobile email client.

Surely you're not suggesting that ROK would ever *forget* anything?:-)
But mailing list configuration is likely - AFAIR, this list like most
others block messages from non-subscribers to cut down on spam. And the
last message directly from Richard that I still have in my inbox happens
to be this one:
http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094170.html

Raimo did dutifully reply to that message, but one possibility is that
Richard didn't get around to re-subscribing, and get the list messages
forwarded from his old address, while his own messages that use the new
address are blocked. Raimo, maybe you can have a look? I know that it's
outside what can be expected from standard mailing list maintenance, but
this concerns a very special subscriber...

--Per

> On 28 July 2018 12:29:57 GMT+10:00, Fred Hebert <mononcqc@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
>     On 07/28, zxq9@REDACTED wrote:
> 
> 
>         So, Richard, if you happen to read this... any idea why your mail isn't
>         hitting the list lately? Maybe one account or another is unsubscribed?
> 
> 
> 
>     A common cause of problems for Mailing lists is the presence or absence
>     of an SPF record for custom domains. I can't see ROK's e-mail address
>     from your reposts, but you can do a quick check by doing a DNS lookup.
>     Here's mine for example:
> 
>     ’ dig ferd.ca ANY
>     ...
>     ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>     ferd.ca.                3599    IN      A       208.94.116.79
>     ferd.ca.                3599    IN      MX      5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM.
>     ferd.ca.                3599    IN      MX      10 ASPMX5.GOOGLEMAIL.COM.
>     ...
>     ferd.ca.                3599    IN      TXT     "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all"
>     ferd.ca.                3599    IN      SOA     ns.phx1.nearlyfreespeech.net. hostmaster.nearlyfreespeech.net. 1406273317 600 180 86400 180
> 
>     The MX records indicate that I'm redirecting everything on gmail, but
>     the critical one not to be seen as spam or a spoofed e-mail is the TXT
>     record with the SPF entry in it.
> 
>     Background info is athttps://support.dnsimple.com/articles/spf-record/  
>     orhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
>     -- your mail provider should possibly be able to give a line about it so
>     people can configure their stuff themselves. Google's page is at
>     https://support.google.com/a/answer/33786?hl=en  if you're using gmail.
> 
>     There's a good chance that something like that could be to blame for
>     missing/non-forwarded e-mails.
> 
>     Regards,
>     Fred.
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     erlang-questions mailing list
>     erlang-questions@REDACTED
>     http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Dmitry Belyaev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list