[erlang-questions] gen_statem confusion
Thu Jan 19 14:42:02 CET 2017
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 02:18:23PM -0800, Kenneth Lakin wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 12:48 PM, Fred Hebert wrote:
> > Specifically I copied the terminology from the docs at
> > http://erlang.org/doc/man/gen_statem.html#type-action :
> > I guess that could use some rewording.
> Yeah, the gen_statem documentation has some significantly rough patches.
> (Insert standard "good documentation is hard and often boring work, and
> anyone who volunteers to write accurate documentation that's even
> vaguely legible is a minor hero" disclaimer here.)
Contributions are welcome ;-)
(I do not remember how many times I have tried to rewrite
that particular paragraph)
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions