[erlang-questions] gen_statem confusion
Wed Jan 18 23:18:23 CET 2017
On 01/18/2017 12:48 PM, Fred Hebert wrote:
> Specifically I copied the terminology from the docs at
> http://erlang.org/doc/man/gen_statem.html#type-action :
> I guess that could use some rewording.
Yeah, the gen_statem documentation has some significantly rough patches.
(Insert standard "good documentation is hard and often boring work, and
anyone who volunteers to write accurate documentation that's even
vaguely legible is a minor hero" disclaimer here.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the erlang-questions