[erlang-questions] gen_statem confusion

[Kenneth Lakin]

On 01/18/2017 12:48 PM, Fred Hebert wrote:
> Specifically I copied the terminology from the docs at
> http://erlang.org/doc/man/gen_statem.html#type-action :

<snip>

> I guess that could use some rewording.

Yeah, the gen_statem documentation has some significantly rough patches.
(Insert standard "good documentation is hard and often boring work, and
anyone who volunteers to write accurate documentation that's even
vaguely legible is a minor hero" disclaimer here.)



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20170118/36197ed5/attachment.bin>