[erlang-questions] make.erl vs ct_make.erl

Vlad Dumitrescu vladdu55@REDACTED
Thu Dec 4 10:33:27 CET 2014


I just noticed that make.erl and ct_make.erl are almost identical. There
are a few things in each that aren't in the other, but it looks like it
should be possible to eliminate the duplication by merging everything to

One point to argue about is that the return value in case of error is
'error' for make and {error, Info} for ct_make. This could be addressed by
extending the API, so that users of make won't be affected.

Another point would be that the 'common_test' application now would depend
on 'tools'. Can this be a problem?

best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20141204/16e8f565/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list