[erlang-questions] minor releases in Erlang?
Fri Dec 5 09:25:57 CET 2014
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Imants Cekusins <imantc@REDACTED> wrote:
> Well, a buggy release stays a buggy release: behind times does not
> automatically imply tested.
> Is this then about tagging releases as buggy or tested to help distro
> packagers, application developers and users?
when a release is "buggy", you fix it and release a new one.
In that case it will help any one, developers, because 17 contains some
interesting features, users, because of the first one, distro packagers
because they can have a stable releases containing interesting features for
users and applications developers. That's is that simple.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions