[erlang-questions] Apology

[Benoit Chesneau]

without counting we have erldocs.com
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 at 09:00, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:

> On 09/20/2016 07:07 AM, Luke wrote:
> > Look at the difference in these two pages.
> >
> > http://erlang.org/doc/design_principles/applications.html
> >
> > vs
> >
> > http://elixir-lang.org/docs/stable/elixir/Application.html
> >
> > Why doesn't anyone ever mention that the docs just look crap?
>
> You're comparing a user guide page from Erlang to a function reference
> page from Elixir. The equivalent Erlang page is
> http://erlang.org/doc/man/application.html
>
> And I'll echo Kenneth, the Erlang one is definitely better in my
> opinion. I'm not even sure why the function is described twice in the
> Elixir docs (title and spec). And not needing to go back at the top to
> select another function is very convenient.
>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
> Author of The Erlanger Playbook,
> A book about software development using Erlang
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160920/1a6aa1d3/attachment.htm>