[erlang-questions] non-trivial supervisor idioms? -- An open-source plea!
Tue Nov 2 17:18:07 CET 2010
----- Original Message ----
> From: Attila Rajmund Nohl <attila.r.nohl@REDACTED>
> 2010/10/28, Thomas Lindgren <thomasl_erlang@REDACTED>:
> > Well, Erlang was intended to be easy to learn and use, and these products
> > have
> > had dozens or even hundreds of programmers working on them over many years.
> > It's
> > pretty natural, isn't it?
> On the other hand I think this is true for nearly all programming
> languages, the C/Java projects have similar turnabouts. By the way, I
> had a colleague who has working on AXD, but he said he didn't wrote a
> single line of new code, he just copied and pasted some earlier
> written code - and was genuinely surprised that it worked.
Yes indeed -- it's not a language issue but the reality of running a big
More information about the erlang-questions