Never trust a statistics you didn't forge yourself
Marc van Woerkom
Tue Feb 21 13:52:43 CET 2006
I just got a copy of your survey results and I am upset
First you write:
> To raise more interest for the survey and generate submissions, we have sent messages to
> several discussion groups, once shortly after the start of the survey and once shortly before
> the end:
> ? Usenet: comp.parallel, comp.parallel.mpi, comp.parallel.pvm, comp.sys.super,
> aus.computers.parallel, comp.programming.threads
> ? Mailing Lists: , , ,
> ? Forums: CodeGuru Forum, Intel Developer Services Forum
> ? Websites: slashdot.org
> We know of one incident, where
> an influential member of the Erlang community requested
> members of their mailing list
> to show their support for Erlang by participating in the
> survey, which they promptly did.
> Incidents like this one have of course influenced the
> results as well.
This implies that some kind of guru is able to motivate
I can't remember who it was who posted this to erlang
mailing list. I was just informed that there was a survey
and of course it made perfect sense to participate as I am
a user of a concurrent language. That's what it is good
There are obviously at least two camps of concurrent
problems - the massive number crunching ones and the ones
where you have lots of parallel transactions in a possibly
distributed system - that's where Erlang is strong.
You obviously posted to
all from the number crunchers camp and even to
- CodeGuru Forum
which is a Java forum.
Why did you not post to the erlang list yourself?
> We have already told you the reasons for the relatively > > high numbers for Erlang in section
> 2, so please treat them with caution. What can be deduced > from these numbers,
> though, is that Erlang has a very active user community
> and it is obviously possible to
> write parallel programs in Erlang.
You could have known before.
Marc van Woerkom
More information about the erlang-questions