[erlang-questions] cover:analyze ambiguity

[Roger Lipscombe]

Any chance of a better API for cover:analyze that doesn't have all of
the ambiguity?

cover:analyse(M, module) gets tripped up if I have a module named
'coverage' or 'calls'. Similarly, there's a comment in there that
*hopes* that we don't have a module named 'html'.

Seems like an improved interface (keep the old one as well, obviously)
would be a good thing.