[erlang-questions] cowboy_static / file:sendfile
Loïc Hoguin
essen@REDACTED
Wed Dec 12 16:52:09 CET 2018
Hello,
This might have been fixed in OTP-21.2:
OTP-15461 Application(s): erts
Related Id(s): ERL-784
Fixed bug in file:sendfile when the send operation
failed. For sockets in active modes it could cause
emulator crash or a hanging call. For sockets with
{active,false} an unexpected {inet_reply, _, _} message
could be sent to the calling process. The bug exists
since OTP-21.0.
On 12/12/18 4:40 PM, Steve Strong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m seeing a potential issue with file:sendfile if the client shuts down
> the connection. My setup is a cowboy server with a simple cowboy_static
> endpoint, and a rate-limited curl as the client - if I start the curl
> download and then ctrl-c curl before it completes, cowboy sits hung
> inside the call to sendfile.
>
> I inspected the cowboy process as follows:
>
> (file_encoder@REDACTED <mailto:file_encoder@REDACTED>)83> P = processes().
> [<0.0.0>,<0.1.0>,<0.2.0>,<0.3.0>,<0.4.0>,<0.5.0>,<0.8.0>,
> <0.40.0>,<0.42.0>,<0.44.0>,<0.45.0>,<0.47.0>,<0.48.0>,
> <0.50.0>,<0.51.0>,<0.52.0>,<0.53.0>,<0.54.0>,<0.55.0>,
> <0.56.0>,<0.57.0>,<0.58.0>,<0.59.0>,<0.60.0>,<0.61.0>,
> <0.62.0>,<0.63.0>,<0.64.0>,<0.65.0>|…]
>
> %% Run curl and ctrl-c in a separate window…
>
> (file_encoder@REDACTED <mailto:file_encoder@REDACTED>)84>
> erlang:process_info(hd(processes() -- P), [current_function, messages]).
> [{current_function,{prim_inet,sendfile_1,4}},
> {messages,[{'EXIT',<0.1798.0>,normal},
> {tcp_closed,#Port<0.266>},
> {inet_reply,#Port<0.266>,{error,closed}}]}]
>
>
> This process looks doomed to live forever - it is stuck in
> prim_inet:sendfile_1 on the following receive:
>
> receive
> {sendfile, S, {ok, SentLow, SentHigh}} ->
> {ok, SentLow bor (SentHigh bsl 32)};
> {sendfile, S, {error, Reason}} ->
> {error, Reason};
> {'EXIT', S, _Reason} ->
> {error, closed}
> end
>
> The port that it had opened, 0.266, has closed so there will never be an
> exit message:
>
> (file_encoder@REDACTED <mailto:file_encoder@REDACTED>)89> erlang:ports().
> [#Port<0.0>,#Port<0.2>,#Port<0.4>,#Port<0.5>,#Port<0.6>,
> #Port<0.8>,#Port<0.10>,#Port<0.11>,#Port<0.12>,#Port<0.13>,
> #Port<0.14>,#Port<0.15>,#Port<0.16>,#Port<0.254>,
> #Port<0.255>,#Port<0.256>,#Port<0.257>,#Port<0.258>,
> #Port<0.259>,#Port<0.260>,#Port<0.261>,#Port<0.262>,
> #Port<0.263>,#Port<0.264>]
>
> I’m guessing the process wasn’t linked with the port, or it would have
> received the exit message and all would have been well. Unsure if this
> is a cowboy or prim_inet bug, or indeed if I’ve done something wrong.
> Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
--
Loïc Hoguin
https://ninenines.eu
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list