[erlang-questions] cowboy_static / file:sendfile
Steve Strong
steve@REDACTED
Thu Dec 13 19:10:39 CET 2018
Yes, 21.2 appears to have solved it - thanks!
> On 12 Dec 2018, at 15:52, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This might have been fixed in OTP-21.2:
>
> OTP-15461 Application(s): erts
> Related Id(s): ERL-784
>
> Fixed bug in file:sendfile when the send operation
> failed. For sockets in active modes it could cause
> emulator crash or a hanging call. For sockets with
> {active,false} an unexpected {inet_reply, _, _} message
> could be sent to the calling process. The bug exists
> since OTP-21.0.
>
> On 12/12/18 4:40 PM, Steve Strong wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I’m seeing a potential issue with file:sendfile if the client shuts down the connection. My setup is a cowboy server with a simple cowboy_static endpoint, and a rate-limited curl as the client - if I start the curl download and then ctrl-c curl before it completes, cowboy sits hung inside the call to sendfile.
>> I inspected the cowboy process as follows:
>> (file_encoder@REDACTED <mailto:file_encoder@REDACTED>)83> P = processes().
>> [<0.0.0>,<0.1.0>,<0.2.0>,<0.3.0>,<0.4.0>,<0.5.0>,<0.8.0>,
>> <0.40.0>,<0.42.0>,<0.44.0>,<0.45.0>,<0.47.0>,<0.48.0>,
>> <0.50.0>,<0.51.0>,<0.52.0>,<0.53.0>,<0.54.0>,<0.55.0>,
>> <0.56.0>,<0.57.0>,<0.58.0>,<0.59.0>,<0.60.0>,<0.61.0>,
>> <0.62.0>,<0.63.0>,<0.64.0>,<0.65.0>|…]
>> %% Run curl and ctrl-c in a separate window…
>> (file_encoder@REDACTED <mailto:file_encoder@REDACTED>)84> erlang:process_info(hd(processes() -- P), [current_function, messages]).
>> [{current_function,{prim_inet,sendfile_1,4}},
>> {messages,[{'EXIT',<0.1798.0>,normal},
>> {tcp_closed,#Port<0.266>},
>> {inet_reply,#Port<0.266>,{error,closed}}]}]
>> This process looks doomed to live forever - it is stuck in prim_inet:sendfile_1 on the following receive:
>> receive
>> {sendfile, S, {ok, SentLow, SentHigh}} ->
>> {ok, SentLow bor (SentHigh bsl 32)};
>> {sendfile, S, {error, Reason}} ->
>> {error, Reason};
>> {'EXIT', S, _Reason} ->
>> {error, closed}
>> end
>> The port that it had opened, 0.266, has closed so there will never be an exit message:
>> (file_encoder@REDACTED <mailto:file_encoder@REDACTED>)89> erlang:ports().
>> [#Port<0.0>,#Port<0.2>,#Port<0.4>,#Port<0.5>,#Port<0.6>,
>> #Port<0.8>,#Port<0.10>,#Port<0.11>,#Port<0.12>,#Port<0.13>,
>> #Port<0.14>,#Port<0.15>,#Port<0.16>,#Port<0.254>,
>> #Port<0.255>,#Port<0.256>,#Port<0.257>,#Port<0.258>,
>> #Port<0.259>,#Port<0.260>,#Port<0.261>,#Port<0.262>,
>> #Port<0.263>,#Port<0.264>]
>> I’m guessing the process wasn’t linked with the port, or it would have received the exit message and all would have been well. Unsure if this is a cowboy or prim_inet bug, or indeed if I’ve done something wrong. Any ideas?
>> Cheers,
>> Steve
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> https://ninenines.eu
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list