[erlang-questions] noisy failures

[Daniil Churikov]

Here is my relx.config:


{release, {app_name, "0.0.1"}, [app_name, 
sasl]}.                                                                                                                                                                    

{extended_start_script, 
true}.                                                                                                                                                                                       



If you add sasl, you can see more verbose logs in _rel/log/ directory


On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 3:59:17 PM UTC+4, t x wrote:
>
> Hi, 
>
>
> ## context: 
>
>   * I'm using erlang.mk + relx 
>
>   * I'm running my erlang apps as one of the following: 
>       _rel/bin/app_name start 
>       _rel/bin/app_name console 
>
>   * what I like about "_rel/bin/app_name start" <-- I feel like this 
> is the right way for production use 
>
>   * what I like about "_rel/bin/app_name console" <-- I get noisy 
> failures (i.e. when something goes wrong, it floods stdout 
>
>
> ## what I want: 
>
>   I want to use "_rel/bin/app_name start", yet get the same level of 
> errors/warnings/assertions as I do when I run it as "_rel/bin/app_name 
> console" 
>
>
> ## what I have tried: 
>
>   * _rel/bin/app_name start 
>   * _rel/bin/app_name remote_console 
>
>   However, "start + remote_console" does not seem to get me the same 
> amount of errors as I do from "console". 
>
>
> ## question: 
>
>   Is there a wya to use start + remote_console, yet get the same level 
> of errors / warnings as with "console"? 
>
> Thanks! 
> _______________________________________________ 
> erlang-questions mailing list 
> erlang-q...@REDACTED <javascript:> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140403/20deec89/attachment.htm>