[erlang-questions] Proposal to change Erlang's license

[Kalinni Gorzkis]

On Nov 15, 2013 6:38 PM, "Francesco Cesarini" <
francesco@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> The original MPL 2.0, no a modified one. What Loic says is correct, and
from what I understand, Ericsson legal is ok with this approach.
Contributors who have submitted changes have already been contacted, and
the response was favorable.
>
> Francesco
>
>
> On 15/11/2013 11:32, Loïc Hoguin wrote:
>>
>> On 11/15/2013 11:31 AM, Kalinni Gorzkis wrote:
>>>
>>> The original MPL 2.0 or a modified version? Don't modify the license,
>>> the modified version will be GPL-incompatible, and the MPL 2.0 is
>>> designed to be international.
>>
>>
>> The goal is to have a well known unmodified license to make it easier to
use Erlang in commercial projects. Choice is MPL 2.0 because the current
license is derived from MPL 1.0.
>>
>
> --
> Erlang Solutions Ltd.
> http://www.erlang-solutions.com
>
Everything is OK now. But please license it under "MPL 2.80 or any later
version", not "MPL 2.0 only".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20131115/9bba66ab/attachment.htm>