[erlang-questions] gen_server durable queue

[Andrew Berman]

No, not yet, Max.  I'll let you know what I decide to do.

Thanks,

Andrew

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Max Bourinov <bourinov@REDACTED> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> Did you find the answer for your question? What is your approach? I have
> similar task and I do it with Rabbit but I want to know about all
> possibilities.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 26.06.2012, at 21:30, Andrew Berman <rexxe98@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> Actually, found two articles relating to the difference:
>
>    1. http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2011/06/30/zeromq-erlang/
>    2.
>    http://jlouisramblings.blogspot.com/2011/10/one-major-difference-zeromq-and-erlang.html
>
> The way I see it, if you're using Erlang, there's no point to using 0MQ.
>  It really provides the same features, just differently.  I feel like 0MQ
> would be great for a language that doesn't provide what Erlang does
> natively.
>
> --Andrew
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Alex Shneyderman <a.shneyderman@REDACTED
> > wrote:
>
>> > I've looked at 0MQ before, but I'm not clear what it provides me over
>> just
>> > using standard Erlang message passing or using something like gproc.
>>  Can
>> > you shed any light on this?
>>
>> Not over Erlang, no. But you mentioned you wanted to use Rabbit. I
>> find Rabbit a bit
>> problematic as it will require an extra node to worry about, if you
>> want it to be reliable
>> you will need more than one. 0MQ is a library that has no such
>> requirements it will
>> live on any node you start but you will have to encode reliability on
>> your own. Hence
>> my reference to zguide, which explains exactly how to do it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alex.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120627/b7c18746/attachment.htm>