[erlang-questions] [ANN] misultin v0.7

[Roberto Ostinelli]

hi yurii, robert,

i confirm that misultin 0.7.1 will have:

. support for both pmods and pure erlang;
. support for HEAD, PUT and DELETE methods.

r.

2011/4/12 Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk@REDACTED>

> Roberto,
>
> $ cat misultin_req.erl
> -module(misultin_req).
> -export([ok/1]).
> -record(misultin_req, {req,socket_pid}).
>
> ok(#misultin_req{req = Req}) ->
>  io:format("got req: ~p~n",[Req]).
>
> $ erl
> Erlang R14B02 (erts-5.8.3) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-
> threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
>
> Eshell V5.8.3  (abort with ^G)
> 1> Req = {misultin_req, request_stuff, self()}.
> {misultin_req,request_stuff,<0.31.0>}
> 2> misultin_req:ok(Req).
> got req: request_stuff
> ok
> 3> Req:ok().
> got req: request_stuff
> ok
>
> Roberto Ostinelli wrote:
> > hello robert,
> >
> > i've had similar requests on #erlang and this is definitely on the todo
> > list.
> >
> > i will of course need to support backwards compatibility and i need to
> spend
> > some time in figuring out what is the best way to do so. if you feel like
> > sharing any pointers, i'll obviously be very glad to read from you :)
> >
> > r.
> >
> >
> > 2011/4/12 Robert Virding <robert.virding@REDACTED>
> >
> > > Roberto,
> > >
> > > I am only a casual writer of webservers and Misultin has worked well so
> > > far. It has been easy to use and has had sufficient features for what I
> > > need. BUT couldn't you make a misultin-- without parametrized modules
> using
> > > only standard erlang for us users who prefer classic Erlang? :-)
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110412/d6e3359f/attachment.htm>