[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?
Tue Nov 18 23:00:38 CET 2008
So why not restrict the package hierarchy to two levels.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Richard O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2008, at 7:36 pm, Dave Smith wrote:
>> The package hierarchy does not need to be deep.
> This is perfectly true. But if the Java and Haskell experiences
> are anything to go by, it WILL become deep whether it needs to
> or not. We can confidently expect people experienced in Java to
> continue using Java naming practices in Erlang. (Heck, haven't
> we already seen enough pointlessly ugly baStudlyCaps trickling
> into Erlang like pus from an Erebus-sized boil?)
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions