[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?

Richard O'Keefe ok@REDACTED
Tue Nov 18 22:57:16 CET 2008

On 18 Nov 2008, at 7:36 pm, Dave Smith wrote:
> The package hierarchy does not need to be deep.

This is perfectly true.  But if the Java and Haskell experiences
are anything to go by, it WILL become deep whether it needs to
or not.  We can confidently expect people experienced in Java to
continue using Java naming practices in Erlang.  (Heck, haven't
we already seen enough pointlessly ugly baStudlyCaps trickling
into Erlang like pus from an Erebus-sized boil?)

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list