[erlang-questions] Selective receive issue

Vlad Dumitrescu vladdu55@REDACTED
Tue Aug 5 16:18:27 CEST 2008

Hi again,

This may work, I didn't study it in all detail yet, but it feels like a lot
of complexity just to be eliminate unneeded messages. I think I will ignore
this for the time being and assume all processes play nice, and will get
back at the issue when the main logic is working as it should (which it
doesn't yet). I'll let you know how it goes!

Thanks for the input!!

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 15:43, Grasl Christoph <C.Grasl@REDACTED> wrote:

>  Hi again!
> So why not use a second loop in the processInput/2 - funcction and
> return a state-change to the original loop if desired?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20080805/6e37b82c/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list