[erlang-questions] process dictionary, anyone?

Jeremy Thurgood jerith@REDACTED
Wed May 2 13:25:54 CEST 2007

Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> Java is just an example. It seems like a probable candidate just by
> the sheer mass of users and libraries (of which BTW I assume most will
> be reusable on the improved platform).

Given the number of Java libraries that aren't threadsafe and the 
magnitude of the paradigm shift required to get the benefits of Erlang 
in any language, I don't think that's going to be the case.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list