Please test snapshots of the coming R9C

Kent Boortz kent@REDACTED
Thu Jul 24 16:55:50 CEST 2003

Per Bergqvist <per@REDACTED> writes:
> Hi Kent,
> Just to reiterate, the ssl application does not build on RedHat 9
> without the kerberos 5 check.
> Attached is a patch file with only this check.
> The only thing the patch does is that it will include the path to
> the kerberos header files, why not simply merge it ?

I haven't had time to look at the patch, I'm just trying to be
careful. I'm sure the patch is correct but from a quick look at it to
me it looks like the test will prefer krb5.h in
"/usr/kerberos/include" over "$SSL_ROOT/include" if the file was found
in both locations (missing break out of loop?). Is this what you
intended? Don't we also need to find the lib that matches the header
file? Or isn't the kerberos lib needed by the resulting binaries?

I try to use the same standard and carefulness merging parts only used
by OpenSource and what is used for the commercial builds but I'm
probably too careful. The patch will not change our builds for our
commercial customers so it is now merged.

Sorry about the delay. I don't mean to be negative, we really
appreciate the patches we get,


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list