[erlang-questions] What is the point of Spawn(Node, Fun) if Node has to have the same module loadable as a client node?
Tue Sep 6 07:23:50 CEST 2016
Would an Erlang AST do it?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe <>
> There is of course another possibility.
> If you need to send "pieces of behaviour" to another node,
> you can define a mini-language represented as Erlang
> data structures as part of the protocol, and send something
> over that is a *scrutable* data structure in which general
> Bad Things simply aren't expressible, and that can be
> interpreted or compiled to Erlang by the receiver as it
> chooses. "Stuff we can run" doesn't have to be Erlang
> any more than it has to be ARM assembly code.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions