[erlang-questions] Behavior callbacks in edoc output

[Pierre Fenoll]

Edoc not handling -callback sounds like a bug (or something not implemented
yet).
You should file a bug at http://bugs.erlang.org/


Cheers,
-- 
Pierre Fenoll


On 24 December 2015 at 10:45, Unix One <unix1@REDACTED> wrote:

> I guess no news is bad news. I'm going to manually type the callback
> specifications in, while at the same time looking for an alternative to
> edoc.
>
> Thank you in advance for any insight.
>
> On 12/20/2015 05:00 AM, Unix One wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it possible to have edoc generate documentation for behavior
> callbacks?
> >
> > I found the following:
> >
> > http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-patches/2012-July/002912.html
> > http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2012-August/068722.html
> >
> > which reference planned fix, but edoc still generates a mostly blank
> > behavior output with only the top level module description. Adding a
> > @doc block before the -callback results in the edoc error about it not
> > being allowed in module footer.
> >
> > It seems like an important piece of documentation to omit from output.
> > Am I missing something obvious?
> >
> > Thank you!
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20151224/d81ec2f7/attachment.htm>