[erlang-questions] languages in use? [was: Time for OTP to be Renamed?]

Miles Fidelman mfidelman@REDACTED
Sun Feb 16 22:11:01 CET 2014

Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Miles Fidelman 
> <mfidelman@REDACTED <mailto:mfidelman@REDACTED>> wrote:
>     Nice piece.
>     What's frightening about it  is how closely those requirements
>     also scream "Ada"  - which seems to have become the language of
>     choice for aviation software - both hard real-time fly-by-wire
>     software and massively distributed systems for air traffic
>     control.  (Dare I say it, another language that "flys under the
>     radar." :-)
>     Talk about divergent solutions to similar requirements.
> I'll claim that they cover different areas. The key difference is hard 
> vs soft real time. Where Ada can work with the former, Erlang relaxes 
> the requirement to soft realtime and gains a lot of benefits by doing so.

Good point.  "Let it crash" does take on a whole different meaning when 
dealing with aircraft and such.


In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list