[erlang-questions] languages in use? [was: Time for OTP to be Renamed?]

Thomas Lindgren thomasl_erlang@REDACTED
Mon Feb 17 00:11:10 CET 2014

Why, Miles, the solutions are similar -- we just launch another one.


On Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:11 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@REDACTED> wrote:
Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Miles Fidelman 
>> <mfidelman@REDACTED <mailto:mfidelman@REDACTED>> wrote:
>>     Nice piece.
>>     What's frightening about it  is how closely those requirements
>>     also scream "Ada"  - which seems to have become the language of
>>     choice for aviation software - both hard real-time fly-by-wire
>>     software and massively distributed systems for air traffic
>>     control.  (Dare I say it, another language that "flys under the
>>     radar." :-)
>>     Talk about divergent solutions to similar requirements.
>> I'll claim that they cover different areas. The key difference is hard 
>> vs soft real time. Where Ada can work with the former, Erlang relaxes 
>> the requirement to soft realtime and gains a lot of benefits by doing so.
>Good point.  "Let it crash" does take on a whole different meaning when 
>dealing with aircraft and such.
>In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
>In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra
>erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140216/08d130bb/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list