[erlang-questions] Erlang is the best choice for building commercial application servers
Thu Mar 15 17:32:22 CET 2012
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Michael Truog wrote:
>> I agree that there has been lots of negativity in the past connected
>> with statements at previous startups like:
>> 1) "Erlang is just a prototype language"
>> 2) "Erlang is only a testing language"
>> 3) "Erlang is a ghetto"
>> I don't believe these statements, but I believe that their existence
>> and continuation is unfortunate. I think the only thing that may
>> perpetuate these types of statements, is a lack of clear statements
>> about Erlang's intent by current practitioners (as it is meant to
>> exist in current products). I understand that we have newer
>> products, like RabbitMQ and Riak which can help provide examples of
>> Erlang success within production (much of the previous success coming
>> from ejabberd). I am just disappointed by how these statements are
>> very persistent, and may often prevent the use of Erlang.
> Personally, if Erlang shortens time-to-market and software maintenance
> costs, and improves scalability, then I'm all for the competition
> continuing to believe the myths. :-)
I should add... particularly if larger, better-funded competition
continues to waste time and money and build/maintain overly-complicated,
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
More information about the erlang-questions