[erlang-questions] [Dialyser] Type parametrized behaviours
Tue Apr 24 22:27:18 CEST 2012
On 24/04/12 21:15, Stavros Aronis wrote:
> I do not want to go much further with this, but I fail to understand
> what kind of changes would trigger this need for extensive changes. If
> the behaviour code needs to be agnostic of the type of this state
> variable and "term()" needs not be changed due to this reason. The type
> definitions are already in every module because that's where the
> specialization is being made. On the other hand, if the same type is
> used in many modules then it should be defined in the behaviour module
> and exported. Then it can be used in all of them, without any need of
> copying. Could you provide a more detailed example?
It's not even that much about changing code, it's just that doing what
you propose (re-spec'ing all the definitions in the module) is an ugly,
ugly solution, and there is no need for it. Code repetition is bad, and
this is a form of it.
I don't understand what you mean with "the behaviour code needs to be
agnostic of the type of this state variable ...".
By the way, what we did before implements what you're saying, but a bit
better, since we only needed to define the specs once and then include
them each time. In this case we'd always need to define them at least twice.
Example: we have a behaviour `rabbit_backing_queue':
. The types `ack()' and `state()' are specific to the implementation. An
example implementation is rabbit_variable_queue (
) implements this behaviour, and defines ack() and state() types, which
are now unused. Following your suggestion I'd have to re-define the
15-or so methods in rabbit_backing_queue, which is really undesirable -
I'd rather just leave things as they are.
More information about the erlang-questions