[erlang-questions] 'reply-to' header in this mailing list

[Mazen Harake]

http://erlang.2086793.n4.nabble.com/mailing-list-quot-reply-to-quot-td3067987.html

See David Mercer's response.

/M

On 17 May 2011 13:50, Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@REDACTED> wrote:

> I don't want to discuss this. Just wanted to ask why because it is unusual
> these days.
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Mazen Harake <mazen.harake@REDACTED>wrote:
>
>> This has been debated for as long as mailing lists have been used. This is
>> a philosophical question.
>>
>> To shortcut the discussion which will probably develop now: Use "reply
>> all".
>>
>> Everyone should learn this. The other way is simply a hack.
>>
>> See: http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html
>>
>> /M
>>
>>
>> On 17 May 2011 13:04, Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>>> Hej,
>>>
>>> Why this mailing list doesn't add itself to the 'reply-to' header? I see
>>> it isn't uncommon for subscribers to send message to the author directly
>>> instead of the list.
>>>
>>> I wonder why?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Alexander
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110517/ebee02a9/attachment.htm>