[erlang-questions] 'reply-to' header in this mailing list

Alexander Krasnukhin <>
Tue May 17 14:03:18 CEST 2011


Yeah, yeah. I've got this. It is some kind of local joke. Don't have
anything to ask? Why not just ask why the hell "reply-to" isn't the mailing
list address itself?

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mazen Harake <>wrote:

>
> http://erlang.2086793.n4.nabble.com/mailing-list-quot-reply-to-quot-td3067987.html
>
> See David Mercer's response.
>
> /M
>
>
> On 17 May 2011 13:50, Alexander Krasnukhin <> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to discuss this. Just wanted to ask why because it is unusual
>> these days.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Mazen Harake <>wrote:
>>
>>> This has been debated for as long as mailing lists have been used. This
>>> is a philosophical question.
>>>
>>> To shortcut the discussion which will probably develop now: Use "reply
>>> all".
>>>
>>> Everyone should learn this. The other way is simply a hack.
>>>
>>> See: http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html
>>>
>>> /M
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17 May 2011 13:04, Alexander Krasnukhin <>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hej,
>>>>
>>>> Why this mailing list doesn't add itself to the 'reply-to' header? I see
>>>> it isn't uncommon for subscribers to send message to the author directly
>>>> instead of the list.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder why?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alexander
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
Alexander
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110517/86763b62/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list