[erlang-questions] 'reply-to' header in this mailing list

[Alexander Krasnukhin]

I don't want to discuss this. Just wanted to ask why because it is unusual
these days.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Mazen Harake <mazen.harake@REDACTED>wrote:

> This has been debated for as long as mailing lists have been used. This is
> a philosophical question.
>
> To shortcut the discussion which will probably develop now: Use "reply
> all".
>
> Everyone should learn this. The other way is simply a hack.
>
> See: http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html
>
> /M
>
>
> On 17 May 2011 13:04, Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Hej,
>>
>> Why this mailing list doesn't add itself to the 'reply-to' header? I see
>> it isn't uncommon for subscribers to send message to the author directly
>> instead of the list.
>>
>> I wonder why?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
Alexander
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110517/6092e356/attachment.htm>