[erlang-questions] UML or other modeling tools
Fri Jan 14 01:46:09 CET 2011
On 09/01/11 23:06, Ulf Wiger wrote:
> - The things most interesting to model in an Erlang program are the
> state machines and the interaction between processes, but UML
> state machines have very complex - and most importantly, *different*
> - semantics, making it quite probable that the design becomes subject
> to compromises forced by the modeling tool, rather than reflecting the
> power of the programming language.
I wonder if you could expand on what these differences are. As a novice
at both UML and Erlang, I don't want to fall into any traps caused by
making false assumptions.
More information about the erlang-questions