[erlang-questions] fast file sending - erlang & nginx

Roberto Ostinelli roberto@REDACTED
Mon Nov 22 22:21:39 CET 2010

2010/11/21 Steve Vinoski <vinoski@REDACTED>:
> My experiences and measurements show pretty much the same thing. I
> don't think gen_tcp necessarily targets top performance, but rather is
> designed to be portable and tie cleanly into the whole inet framework,
> but by doing so it suffers from unnecessary overhead in a variety of
> places. Some of the problem areas we've observed are too many
> {set,get}sockopt calls made that don't seem to add value, inet_db ets
> lookups on each gen_tcp operation to find the socket driver, and some
> handling of socket options/parameters in prim_inet that seems overly
> expensive.
> gen_tcp2, anyone?

that could be an interesting idea.

>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Roberto Ostinelli <roberto@REDACTED>wrote:
>>> instead, i tried using the sendfile system call developed by steve
>>> vinosky sendfile_drv, packaged by tuncer
> Vinoski, not Vinosky. :-)

oops. sorry for that :)

>>> [https://github.com/tuncer/sendfile], since in this way the file
>>> reading is anyway done by a fast C system call and i would be able to
>>> see if there are any differences. the results are that raw throughput
>>> remains around the same.
> That surprises me, but at the very least you should see much lower CPU
> with the sendfile driver.
> --steve

yes, i confirm. however mine haven't been exhaustive tests at all,
just some benches on a local osx with snow leopard.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list