[erlang-questions] guard expression restriction

James Churchman <>
Fri Dec 3 14:48:24 CET 2010


would it have to be "silently changed".. RefactorErl, Wrangler or Dialyzer could be modified to "upgrade" or at least produce warning in all* cases where flipping the functionality would effect the true functionality of it. Also i would guess much code is written with out the knowledge that some LC guards fail silently, some don't  :-)

*all in this case means "i assume all" 

On 3 Dec 2010, at 09:36, Robert Virding wrote:

> I wonder what would happen if it was just silently changed? :-)



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list