[erlang-questions] Getting support for X.692 in the asn1 application OR "If not ASN.1, then what?"
Fri May 1 14:28:47 CEST 2009
ECN = X.692 ;-)
The problem with the lovely binaries in Erlang is that I have to write the
encode/decode functions myself.
I want to be able to specify how my PDUs look like and get the encode/decode
for free just like with the asn1 application.
p.s. I am not lazy, I am a mathematician!!
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Cameron Kerr <> wrote:
> Would ASN.1's ECN (Explicit Coding Notation) work for this?
> Not sure if that is supported by the asn1 module either... if not, then
> Erlang's binary support should be pretty useful.
> On 30/04/2009, at 8:59 PM, Torben Hoffmann wrote:
> I am looking into finding efficient ways of dealing with legacy protocols
> and during that I found the X.692 standard:
> The ASN.1 compiler barfs on the ELM and EDM modules since X.692 is not
> supported by the asn1 application.
> What are the chances of X.692 being supported by the asn1 application?
> A aside: no matter how fun it really is to code Erlang nothing beats
> getting a pair of encode-decode functions for free.
> BTW: the key need I am trying to address is the ability to specify the PDUs
> of an arbitrarily weird protocol (mostly telecom ones) and then get a codec
> for it. ASN.1 is not a holy grail for me and other good technologies will be
> looked at if you suggest it.
> Thanks in advance,
> erlang-questions mailing list
> Cameron Kerr <>
> Teaching Fellow, Computer Science, University of Otago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions