Thu Mar 5 00:16:11 CET 2009
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Michael Truog <mjtruog@REDACTED> wrote:
> Doesn't mnesia qualify with its support for transactions?
That seems to be the general sentiment of the replies I'm getting here.
Mnesia is certainly a transactional approach to dealing with shared state
but I don't think that really qualifies it as an STM system. I'm afraid if
we try to delve any deeper it's just going to turn into a semantic argument
about what STM actually means, so to those of you who think Mnesia is an STM
system, I'm just going to say "Great!"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions