[erlang-questions] making http client close connections

Oscar Hellström oscar@REDACTED
Wed Jun 10 09:41:45 CEST 2009


Oh, and if you still want to use inets, check out http:cancel_request/1,2...

----- "Oscar Hellström" <oscar@REDACTED> wrote:

> Ok... you essentially want to stop waiting for a response, not closing
> the socket after a response, right?
> 
> If you look at the interface for lhttpc though, you should be able to
> implement a asynchronous HTTP request by spawning a lhttpc_client. You
> can look at what the lhttpc module does, and kinda copy this, bit in a
> specific way.
> 
> Essentially you would be doing something like:
> Client = spawn_link(lhttpc_client, request, [self(), URL, Method,
> Hdrs, Body]),
> ...
> Here you would need to expect to get a {response, Child, Response}
> message back. When you don't feel like waiting for the poll, just do:
> unlink(Client),
> kill(Client, timeout), % or kill or whatever...
> You could also use the way it's done in lhttpc:kill_client/1 if you
> want to make sure that there are no messages send to you between you
> gave up and the Client process was killed.
> 
> Since the socket is owned by the Client process, it would take it with
> it. If you do get a response and server sends Connection: close, you
> won't pass this socket to the manager to be re-used either. I don't
> see why you wouldn't want to re-use it though.
> 
> I imagine that limiting this to one socket / system should be
> something you'd want to implement in your logic though.
> 
> Maybe if you explained what you're trying to do from the beginning,
> you wouldn't get all the useless replies...
> 
> Good luck :)
> 
> ----- "Joel Reymont" <joelr1@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> > The connection I'm trying to close on the client side is a long-poll
> 
> > 
> > connection. I cannot use Connection: close in the headers of the  
> > request that establishes it since that will cause the connection to 
> 
> > close, i.e. stop being long-poll.
> > 
> > On Jun 9, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Oscar Hellström wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Joel,
> > >
> > > What I meant was to send the Connection: close in the *headers* of
> 
> > 
> > > the *request*... That signals that the *client* isn't prepared to 
> 
> > > continue to use the connection after the request/response.
> > >
> > > To make it a bit more clear, you could read this:
> > > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.10
> > >
> > > IIRC inets will notice this, and will close the connection.  
> > > Otherwise, have you tried to use {version, "HTTP/1.1"} as on  
> > > HTTPOption?
> > 
> > ---
> > Mac hacker with a performance bent
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
> 
> -- 
> Oscar Hellström, oscar@REDACTED
> Phone:  +44 (0)798 45 44 773
> Mobile: +44 (0)207 65 50 337
> Web:    http://www.erlang-consulting.com
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org

-- 
Oscar Hellström, oscar@REDACTED
Phone:  +44 (0)798 45 44 773
Mobile: +44 (0)207 65 50 337
Web:    http://www.erlang-consulting.com



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list