[erlang-questions] Node communication over insecure links
Mon Nov 24 04:53:37 CET 2008
Yes, everyone's answers have been great. Interception was not the proper
term for me to be use, I guess 'deducted' would be a better term to use for
the scenario in question.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Per Hedeland <> wrote:
> Alex <> wrote:
> >Anyway, my question is in regard to communication between instances over
> >insecure networks and/or nodes. The case example is a network of IRC
> >servers. Having all nodes in the same Erlang instance would be nice, and
> >would make cross server communication a snap. Only issue is that if
> >intercepts the magic cookiee, they gain access to all nodes, Not a good
> I think you already received a good answer, and I'm not suggesting that
> running the communication in cleartext across the Internet is OK -
> however the cookie is never sent on the wire, so it can't be
> "intercepted" *there*.
> --Per Hedeland
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions