[erlang-questions] Inferno - erroneous comments about Erlang?
Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
Thu Jan 25 15:41:20 CET 2007
For C/C++ Language Support, they could add the same
kind of footnote as for Limbo, and for embedded
environment, they could add a footnote similar to
that of Java (but citing a smaller footprint.)
I'm not sure what the most glaring misunderstanding
is - whether it is the alledged lack of a royalty-free
distribution or the supposed lack of a VM. (:
At least, Erlang gets one tick more than XML/SOAP...
> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:] On Behalf Of
> Richard Carlsson
> Sent: den 25 januari 2007 13:54
> To: Hubert Matthews
> Cc: Erlang-Questions (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Inferno - erroneous comments
> about Erlang?
> Hubert Matthews wrote:
> > http://www.vitanuova.com/mkt/press/Inferno_overview.pdf
> > contains at the end a table comparing Inferno, Erlang and lots of
> > other approaches to distributed systems. I think they are
> > about a lot of stuff in this table, particularly about Erlang. Any
> > comments?
> Indeed - they should check every box except "native OS".
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions