[erlang-questions] Inferno - erroneous comments about Erlang?

Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) <>
Thu Jan 25 15:41:20 CET 2007


For C/C++ Language Support, they could add the same 
kind of footnote as for Limbo, and for embedded 
environment, they could add a footnote similar to 
that of Java (but citing a smaller footprint.)

I'm not sure what the most glaring misunderstanding
is - whether it is the alledged lack of a royalty-free 
distribution or the supposed lack of a VM.   (:

At least, Erlang gets one tick more than XML/SOAP...

BR,
Ulf W

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  
> [mailto:] On Behalf Of 
> Richard Carlsson
> Sent: den 25 januari 2007 13:54
> To: Hubert Matthews
> Cc: Erlang-Questions (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Inferno - erroneous comments 
> about Erlang?
> 
> Hubert Matthews wrote:
> > http://www.vitanuova.com/mkt/press/Inferno_overview.pdf
> > 
> > contains at the end a table comparing Inferno, Erlang and lots of 
> > other approaches to distributed systems.  I think they are 
> incorrect 
> > about a lot of stuff in this table, particularly about Erlang.  Any 
> > comments?
> 
> Indeed - they should check every box except "native OS".
> 
>      /Richard
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list