[erlang-questions] process dictionary, anyone?

Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) <>
Tue Apr 24 13:41:26 CEST 2007


 
Mats Cronqvist wrote:
> 
> Thomas Lindgren wrote:
> 
> > PPS. Maybe it wouldn't have been banned if we had
> > thought of this in the first place? Dang.
> 
>    getting banned by ericsson should be considered
> a stamp of approval...


I don't know about that, but there's nothing like 
a few mortal challenges now and then to force you 
to step up and really give it your best. (:
I would wager that the ban was actually good for Erlang.

It is certainly so that since Erlang hasn't been 
mainstream, and at times has been rather fiercely
opposed, there has never been much room for anything
but excellence. 

BR,
Ulf W




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list