[erlang-questions] process dictionary, anyone?

James Hague <>
Tue Apr 24 16:07:35 CEST 2007


On 4/24/07, Mats Cronqvist <> wrote:
>
>    so erlang is functional, except for the process dictionary, messages, ports
> and ets? then perhaps it's time to stop pretending it's functional?

Be hip and modern and call it "multi-paradigm" :)



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list