[erlang-questions] Status of kqueue on FreeBSD
Rickard Green
rickard.s.green@REDACTED
Thu Apr 19 15:21:49 CEST 2007
Alex Arnon wrote:
> Hi Rickard,
>
> Is there also such problem on OpenBSD or NetBSD? Or can I safely use
> kqueue on those platforms?
We haven't had any problems with kqueue on OpenBSD in our daily builds.
For NetBSD I cannot give you an answer, since we haven't got any NetBSD
daily build machines.
> In any case, is there an alternative option?
>
Using poll/select is of course an alternative, but no other kernel-poll
alternative (our configure test is written to prefer /dev/poll and
epoll, but those interfaces will probably not be present).
BR,
Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB.
> Cheers,
> Alex.
>
>
> On 4/18/07, *Rickard Green* <rickard.s.green@REDACTED
> <mailto:rickard.s.green@REDACTED>> wrote:
>
> Oscar Hellström wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've understood that kqueue support is disabled on FreeBSD due to
> issues
> > with (at least) pipes. I've also forced Erlang to build with kqueue
> > support on FreeBSD and are experiencing weird behaviors.
> >
>
> Kqueue's EVFILT_READ didn't always trigger when writing on a pipe with
> writev (depending on the buffer sizes used) on FreeBSD.
>
> > I cannot find much on this issue on the web though, is this an ERTS
> > issue or a FreeBSD issue?
>
> FreeBSD
>
> > Is there work going on to solve it etc?
> >
>
> Not at OTP.
>
> > Best Regards
>
> BR,
> Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB:
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> <http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list