Mon Apr 2 11:48:43 CEST 2007
I based the R11B-4 version of escript on Joe's escript-4.1 (without
your patch), but among other things I changed how the arguments are
I did consider passing the script name as the first argument in the
list, but in the end I didn't want to break compatibility with Joe's
escript or with the description in his book.
We'll probably add a function to the escript module to retrieve the name
of the script in the R11B-5 release. (Unless someone comes up with a better
name, I'll probably call it escript:script_name/0.)
Bengt Kleberg <bengt.kleberg@REDACTED> writes:
> On 2007-03-28 15:52, Bjorn Gustavsson wrote:
> > escript is included in R11B-4.
> it it possible to get the name of the script when using escript?
> i notice that the escript that is included in R11B-4 does not have the
> script itself as the first argument (like a $0 is a shell script). ex:
> #! /tmp/erlang/bin/escript
> main( Arg ) ->
> io:fwrite( "~w~n", [Arg] ).
> i made a patch for joe's escript-4.1 that made the script name
> available, but escript.erl in R11B-4 does not look like it was made from
> Those were the days...
> EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
> solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
> patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."
> erlang-questions mailing list
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions