[erlang-questions] Was Re: Bug ?! now Erlang comment (LONG LONG)

Bengt Kleberg <>
Fri Oct 20 08:35:42 CEST 2006


On 2006-10-20 00:18, James Hague wrote:

> There's the language and then there's the libraries.  The libraries,
> IMO, have a lot more warts in them than the language.  I've posted
> about some of these before, and so have other people. There's basic
> stuff like lists:keysearch pointlessly wrapping the result in a tuple,
> to the confusion between the different dictionary and tree types.
> These changes are time consuming but easy enough to make (assuming you
> don't care about compatibility).

the compatibility problem could be handled if richard carlsons ''new 
standard libraries'' suggestion (using nested modules) was adopted.


bengt
-- 
    EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
    solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
    patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list