parmap/2

Robert Virding <>
Sat Feb 25 17:56:26 CET 2006


What does it have to do with rpc's? I mean why there?

Robert

Claes Wikstrom skrev:
> Robert Virding wrote:
>> Hello Luke,
>>
>> That WAS a cute function, the only thing that could have made even 
>> cuter was if the receive's were in parallel. Though that wouldn't 
>> affect the 
> 
> It's been in the rpc library for some 10 years or so.
> 
> rpc:pmap/3
> 
> 
> /klacke
> 
> 



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list