>
What does it have to do with rpc's? I mean why there? Robert Claes Wikstrom skrev: > Robert Virding wrote: >> Hello Luke, >> >> That WAS a cute function, the only thing that could have made even >> cuter was if the receive's were in parallel. Though that wouldn't >> affect the > > It's been in the rpc library for some 10 years or so. > > rpc:pmap/3 > > > /klacke > >