Tue Feb 21 09:28:54 CET 2006
> Erlang 10.b.9-2 have been rejected for inclusion in Debian
> unstable because of an incomplete copyright file.
> Truthfully, lib/edoc and lib/syntax_tools are under an LGPL
> license. I've added LGPL to the regulatory copyright file. I
> suppose the rest is under the Erlang Public License. Is it
> safe to suppose this?
I would like to add that there is the same problem with Jungerl:
only 33 applications out of 70 have a distribution licence (i.e.
have at least one file that contains the word "licence" ;-)),
and there is no "default" global license for Jungerl as a whole.
More information about the erlang-questions