Fri Feb 10 23:14:07 CET 2006
F# is a very interesting language. It is really OCaml on .NET. Very powerful
functional programming ideas with all the libraries of the .NET world.It is,
in fact, where many of the new ideas in C# 2.0 came from (e.g. the Generics
implementation) and C# 3.0 (e.g. type inference) are coming from. There is
an implementation of their LINQ ideas too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "bryan rasmussen" <>
To: "Alex Peake" <>
Cc: <>; "Fernando Rodriguez (by way of Helmut
Enck-Radana <>)" <>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Erlang Books
> Okay if they're going to publish a book on F# they should definitely
> publish on Erlang, how many people have even heard of F#, that's a
> really far out idea.... that said I'd probably buy it. or trade in all
> my C# books for it.
> Bryan Rasmussen
> On 2/10/06, Alex Peake <> wrote:
> > Quote from James Huddleston of APress (jhuddleston AT ...):
> > "...I'm hoping to get the first book out by the end of 2006 and
> > Apress as the premier publisher on F# and FP in 2007..."
> > So if you give it an FP focus...
> > Alex
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Fernando Rodriguez (by way of Helmut Enck-Radana
> > <>)" <>
> > To: <>
> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:13 AM
> > Subject: RE: Erlang Books...WAS Re: Where to get Concurrent Programming
> > Erlang (2nd Edition)
> > > > At 01:55 2006-02-10, Ryan Rawson wrote:
> > > > >I'm sure O'Reilly would be more than willing to publish some
> > > > books if
> > > > >content were furnished. Although I don't exactly work for them,
> > > > >they are willing as you noted to publish "random pet OSS project"
> > > > >books, then why not erlang?
> > > >
> > > > Some years ago they weren't:
> > > >
> > > > At 11:19 2001-10-18, Joe Armstrong wrote:
> > > > >At the last erlang conferense the idea of a new erlang book
> > > > was discussed.
> > > > >
> > > > >I mailed O'reilly they wern't interested - not a big enough
> > >
> > > Why not try A-Press? They've been publishing lisp books, sowhy not an
> > Erlang on?
> > >
More information about the erlang-questions