So now all I'd like in Erlang is...
Tue Feb 17 17:12:53 CET 2004
Joe Armstrong wrote:
>So now all I'd like in Erlang is:
>1) Higher order code
Could you elaborate?
>2) *Proper* structs
Has any progress been made toward this one? At least some internal
political discussion at Ericsson? :)
>4) Higher order receive
>5) A *tiny* implementation (written 99% in Erlang and 1% in ANSI standard
How tiny do you want to go?
If nothing else, I'd like to see most of the BEAM opcode combination stuff
in beam_load.c be rolled into the compiler. This would be a big win in
terms of reducing complexity.
More information about the erlang-questions