Fw: SCTP API
Sun Apr 4 13:35:12 CEST 2004
Sory for that invalid date on my previous posting...
That happens when one has kids.
Pls -- see below.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valentin" <>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: SCTP API
> Doing SCTP alone does not help much, and yet, all sorts of different
> will cover it good enough. I think that we should move focus up to M3UA.
> It is fairly easy to write a (minimalist) C-Node bridge between vendor
> specific SCTP end-point and Erlang. Such a bridge should push/pull
> messages up (Erlang) and down (SCTP). A pure Erlang based M3UA would
> these messages and push/pull it to/from upper layers.
> A similar bridge may be written north-bound, between existing
> (ok... ISUP, INAP as well) implementations and Erlang-based M3UA.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hal Snyder" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:53 PM
> Subject: Re: SCTP API
> > Vance Shipley <> writes:
> > > Has anyone given much thought as to how SCTP should be integrated
> > > into Erlang?
> > >
> > > The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) [RFC2960] is now
> > > available from Sun as an experimental package(*) and will likely
> > > (IMHO) be included in Solaris 10. There are also implementations for
> > > BSD and Linux available.
> > ISTR a draft submission on SCTP and Erlang transport for a workshop in
> > the last couple years, but I can't find it at the moment...
More information about the erlang-questions