essential Erlang

Stefan Nickl <>
Thu Sep 25 08:58:46 CEST 2003


On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:

> >From your reply I think you misunderstood me. I'll have to be more careful,
> it's been a while since using that much English :-) My question referred not
> to the Erlang OS, but to breaking apart ERTS and OTP into several loosely
> coupled components. Joe did make a case for it, and I tried to propose a
> concrete splitting line. Then I began fantasizing :-)

What about making them into Linux kernel threads, and making beam known
as an executeable format to the kernel?

I believe something like that was done with Java a long time ago,
but maybe this was only some special case of shebang (#!/path/to/interpreter)

CU, SN

-- 
The UNIX equivalent of the "Blue Screen of Death" would be called
"kernel panic". It obviously exists, since I have heard and read about it,
but I've never been witness to it in my professional career.
        John Kirch,
        Networking Consultant and Microsoft Certified Professional (Windows NT)




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list