compiler available for x86 ?.
Sun Oct 8 22:51:45 CEST 2000
Sean Hinde wrote:
> I guess you are talking about Linux, in which case the normal R7B etc
> release works fine. It doesn't do native code compilation but beam compiled
> code is fast enough for most things.
> Maybe I missed the point of your question?
sorry for being so imprecise.
yes, im interesting in distributing a binary only.
1) i wanna deploy 30 times the same application, on client servers, and i dont
wanna bother intalling erlang, or
2) i have access to a server i cant impose to have erlang installed (say
3) or i wanna build utilitaries, and i dont wanna be troubled with release
conflicts as time goes by.
4) a demo softwarein a rpm, and i dont want bothering people downloading 8 mo
of environement, or they cant be root ( to install erlang)
these are different points where i may be interested to build a self contained
binary. so i was looking at how to do that.
and which constraints it may brings, like language restrictions.
(and yes, R7b is quick enough for me!)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luc Taesch [mailto:]
> > Sent: 7 October 2000 12:35
> > To:
> > Subject: compiler available for x86 ?.
> > i once asked which of compiler is available for x86.
> > hipe is for sparc, and etos link is still un-available.
First, they ignore you.
Then, they laugh at you.
Then, they fight you.
Then, you win.
Working code is what matter, not your market capitalization.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions